Grants / Government / Compliance (EN)

For grants / government programs / compliance use-cases. Tone: strict and practical.

1. Critical problem: provable compliance procedures

In many sectors (construction, service, manufacturing), liability is increasing. Yet records are still manual (paper/photos/spreadsheets), and auditability is weak.

• Hard to prove safety briefings and acknowledgements.
• Signatures and logs can be lost or rewritten retroactively.
• Audits require “paper-like” documents, while digital traces are fragmented.

2. NOALYUT approach: externally verifiable documents

NOALYUT creates a verifiable procedure trail and outputs both “as-paper” exports (PDF/JPG) and a structured event log.

Key: append‑only history. Corrections are patches, visible in audits.

3. TBM / safety scenario (example)

1. Create a morning TBM session/document (template + notes).
2. Workers sign via QR/link on their phones (no app install).
3. Fallback: supervisor device signature if needed.
4. Capture acknowledgement and notification proof.
5. Close the document (closure) → final state.
6. Export PDF/JPG and share to messaging/email; attach to audits.

We do not claim “guaranteed safety”. We provide proof that required actions were performed and acknowledged.

4. Why this is better than “photo of paper”

• Paper photos have no verifiable edit history.
• No structured data to measure discipline/quality.
• Hard to bind roles, time, rules, and signatures.

NOALYUT provides both: “paper for audits” + “events for analytics”.

5. Measurable pilot outcomes

Pilot as an experiment: baseline → NOALYUT.

• % days/documents closed
• time-to-close
• patch rate
• dispute rate + time-to-resolve
• manual reconciliation / document preparation time

6. Why this fits government programs

• Reduces retroactive falsification risk.
• Improves procedural discipline with low adoption friction.
• Enables measurable before/after reporting.
• Supports portability/export (no lock-in by design).