Work recording without extra bureaucracy

60-90 seconds a day: roster → hours → day closed. Export to CSV/PDF/JPG.

Problem

  • Spreadsheets and chats don’t create a single source of truth for attendance and hours.
  • Errors and disputes waste time: manual reconciliation and re-approvals.
  • Facts are hard to prove: photos/signatures get lost, versions diverge.

How it works

NOALYUT helps teams record work facts clearly: who showed up, hours, and supporting evidence.

A 60–90 second daily ritual: morning roster, evening hours, confirm — day closed.

Corrections are transparent (no silent overwrites). Export (CSV/PDF/JPG) and keep using your spreadsheets, ERP, and payroll systems.

Private Materials: Password access

FAQ

What NOALYUT does NOT do

  • Does not control people or supervise work in real time
  • Does not guarantee the absence of incidents or accidents
  • Does not replace legal obligations of companies or responsible persons
  • Does not make decisions on behalf of people or remove personal responsibility

NOALYUT records facts and procedures as they occurred and helps provide verifiable documentation — no more, no less.

Safety & Compliance (Korea)

Safety documentation requirements in Korea are becoming stricter. In the event of a serious incident, what matters is not explanations, but verifiable records: briefings were conducted, risks were reviewed, workers were notified and acknowledged participation.

  • TBM and safety briefings with participant acknowledgements
  • Procedure evidence when required: photos, documents, signatures
  • No silent overwrites: transparent change history
  • Exportable records: PDF/JPG “paper-like” documents for review

NOALYUT does not replace legal obligations or real-time supervision — it helps maintain verifiable procedural documentation.

How is NOALYUT different from timesheets/attendance/safety apps?
They store data as “records”. We add a layer where records become verifiable facts: events + evidence + rules at the time of the event + closure.
Why does immutability matter? Editing is convenient.
Editing is convenient—but risky when money, liability, and disputes are involved. We do not forbid corrections; we make them transparent via corrective events so history remains honest and verifiable.
What if someone made a mistake?
The mistake is not erased. A corrective (patch) event is created. This simplifies audit and reduces conflict: you see what happened and what was corrected.
What is a Policy Snapshot in plain words?
It is the “rules of the game” at the time the event happened, so the past cannot be recalculated under new rules.
What does “dispute as an object” mean?
A formal case: what is disputed, what evidence is attached, who must confirm, and what the outcome is. The dispute is closed by a decision—not left hanging in chat.
Do you replace our systems or sit on top of them?
We are designed to sit on top: integrations, exports, compatibility. You do not have to rip out your current systems.
What kinds of evidence are used?
Photos/videos, signatures, device logs, documents, links—depending on procedure. The key is that evidence is bound to the event.
What if evidence quality is low or noisy?
Each event type has an evidence threshold. If quality is below threshold, the event is flagged for review rather than becoming “truth”.
How do you address the “oracle problem” (sensor lies, fake photos)?
No magic promises. We reduce risk via multi‑source evidence, signatures/attestations, access traces, context checks, and procedures. In hard cases, the system makes the issue visible and localized.
What about privacy and personal data?
Default is data minimization and access control. We store only what is needed for verifiability and procedures.
What if we want to leave?
You can export your data. We support the “right to exit” to avoid vendor lock‑in.
What stage are you at?
We have patent filings and a designed architecture. We are building the MVP and running pilots. Video demo and first cases will follow as they become ready.

Pilots

We run pilots to prove impact on real processes—fast, honest, and measurable.

Who it fits

  • construction sites (subcontractors / crews / general contractors),
  • manufacturing (shifts / lines / operations),
  • field service and maintenance (dispatch / jobs / acceptance),
  • any work where there is a dispute: “who / what / when / how much”.

What you get

  • a short ritual for recording events (morning/evening or “as work happens”),
  • evidence bound to events (photos / signatures / logs),
  • shift/period closure under the rules effective at event time,
  • formal dispute objects and a resolution history,
  • data exports (for your accounting and reporting).

How a pilot runs

  • Short interview (30–60 min): pain points, disputes, critical documents.
  • Procedure setup: which events are mandatory and what evidence is required.
  • Baseline week (“as‑is”): measure time spent and dispute volume.
  • 2–4 weeks with NOALYUT: compare before/after.
  • Final report: metrics, findings, recommendations, go/no‑go decision.

Key metrics

  • % of closed days/shifts (closure discipline),
  • time‑to‑close (how fast facts are closed),
  • patch rate (frequency of corrections),
  • dispute rate and time‑to‑resolve.

Optional

  • time saved on reconciliation and reporting,
  • fewer conflicts and payment delays,
  • higher share of events with evidence.

What we need from you

Confidentiality

We share deeper materials only by agreement. NDA-level documents are available under NDA access.

  • one responsible coordinator,
  • 1–2 process types to start,
  • agreement to measure before/after,
  • access to minimal required data (without unnecessary PII).

We treat every request individually and keep it confidential. For sensitive cases (internal conflict, audit, contracts) we start with a private conversation and a minimal pilot.

Contacts

Email: hello@noalyut.com
Company: UTE TLI SYSTEMS Co. Ltd
Address: Republic of Korea, Incheon, Yeonsu-gu, Central-ro 263, IBS Tower, 24F, Office A2424